Family Law Myths Exposed: Part 2
April 23rd, 2010In Part I of this series, I discussed a number of misconceptions about Family Law. Here, the second chapter: Family Law Myths Exposed, Part II
Myth: You should tell the judge about every time the opposing party has wronged you.
Truth: Judges are busy people with full schedules. One of the things they appreciate is brevity. Some facts are relevant, others are not. Chances are, if you recall every detail of every argument you’ve had with your ex-spouse or partner for the past three years, you’re doing yourself a disservice. This is one of the many reasons why having representation in the Probate and Family Courts is so important. Attorneys understand the law, so that they can present the information the judge needs to make a decision without presenting information that might be harmful to your case, or simply irrelevant.
Myth: When a couple divorces, each person automatically gets half.
Truth: When it comes to who gets what, nothing is automatic in a divorce. If the decision is left up to the court (see next myth), the judge will consider a variety of factors in divvying up property. What matters? The list is long but includes who owned what before and during the marriage and how those things were acquired. If one person stayed home to take care of the children while the other was the sole breadwinner, the stay-at-home parent might be awarded more than if he or she worked and earned at a similar level.
Myth: It’s best to just let the judge decide.
Truth: There are very few occasions when it is best to just let the judge decide. Usually, people say this for one of two reasons: they’re uncertain of what they want and how to ask for it, or; they’re so certain that they’re in the right that they’re unwilling to compromise. Yet another reason why the assistance of an attorney can be crucial when it comes to Family Law matters. An Attorney can let you know what expectations are reasonable when it comes to Family Law, and can express what you want in a way that makes legal sense. More importantly, an attorney can let you know what expectations are unreasonable when it comes to Family Law, so that you don’t end up with an order you hate instead of an agreement you could have lived with.
There are very few times when the Family Court would be unwilling to accept an agreement the parties have come up with themselves. As long as it’s fair, and the parties have touched upon all the relevant issues, a Judge is likely to approve an agreement. Isn’t it better for a family to make decisions for itself, rather than asking a relative stranger to do so?






